Topics › System
Social Sciences: Communication and Interpersonal Skills — Step 1 practice questions
193 questions in this area, with an explanation for every answer choice.
Three samples below, free and without an account.
How this shows up on Step 1
These questions ask what you would say next, and the answer is usually the option that acknowledges the patient before acting. Capacity, consent, confidentiality and disclosure recur constantly. The trap is choosing the medically efficient answer over the one that addresses the person.
Sample questions
Sample question 1
A physician must tell a patient that imaging shows metastatic cancer. Which of the following best describes the recommended approach?
Explanations
A. Deliver the news and immediately outline the complete treatment protocol in detail
Retention after bad news is minimal, so detailed planning should follow later.
B. Avoid using the word "cancer" to reduce distress
Euphemism causes confusion and impairs informed decisions.
C. Arrange a private setting, ask what the patient already understands and how much they want to know, give a brief warning, deliver the news in plain language, respond to emotion, and then discuss next steps · correct
Structured protocols such as SPIKES organize this task: arrange the SETTING privately with adequate time, assess the patient's PERCEPTION of their situation, obtain an INVITATION regarding how much detail they want, deliver KNOWLEDGE with a brief warning shot in plain language and small chunks, respond to EMOTIONS with empathic statements, and close with STRATEGY and summary. Two common errors are burying the news in technical preamble and moving immediately to treatment details — after hearing "cancer," retention collapses, so plans are better deferred to a follow-up visit with written information.
D. Begin with an extensive technical explanation before stating the diagnosis
Technical preamble delays and obscures the essential message.
E. Prognosis should be given as a precise number in all cases
Prognostic detail should match what the patient wants to know, often given as ranges.
Sample question 2
A patient suffers a serious complication after surgery that resulted in part from a system failure. Which of the following communication approaches is most consistent with evidence and professional standards?
Explanations
A. Provide information only through the hospital attorney
Routing all communication through counsel damages the relationship.
B. Wait until the investigation is fully complete before saying anything to the patient
Initial disclosure should be prompt, with updates as facts emerge.
C. Promptly disclose what happened, express genuine empathy and apology, explain what will be done to investigate and prevent recurrence, and provide ongoing support · correct
Communication-and-resolution programs — prompt disclosure, sincere apology, explanation, and support — improve patient trust and are associated with FEWER claims and lower costs, contradicting the traditional "deny and defend" assumption. Many states also have apology laws protecting expressions of sympathy. Patients consistently report wanting acknowledgment, an explanation, and assurance that others will be protected.
D. Explain that complications are expected and no discussion is warranted
Dismissing the event as expected disrespects the patient and forgoes learning.
E. Avoid apologizing, since any expression of regret constitutes an admission of liability that increases lawsuits
Evidence does not support the belief that apology increases litigation; silence does.
Sample question 3
A dying patient has severe pain requiring opioid doses that may hasten death through respiratory depression. Which of the following best describes the ethical justification for providing adequate analgesia?
Explanations
A. The principle of double effect, since the intended effect is relief of suffering while the possible hastening of death is a foreseen but unintended side effect of a proportionate treatment · correct
The DOUBLE EFFECT principle holds that an action with both a good intended effect and a foreseen harmful effect is permissible when the act itself is not wrong, the harmful effect is not the MEANS to the good effect, the INTENT is the good effect, and there is proportionate reason. Providing opioids titrated to relieve suffering satisfies these conditions and is ethically and legally accepted, distinguishing it from EUTHANASIA, where death is the intended means of relieving suffering. In practice, appropriately titrated opioids in terminal illness rarely hasten death, and fear of doing so causes far more undertreated suffering than harm.
B. Analgesia should be withheld to avoid any possibility of hastening death
Withholding analgesia causes certain suffering to avoid a small uncertain risk.
C. Intent is irrelevant to the ethical analysis
Intent is central to the double effect analysis.
D. Adequate opioid dosing in terminal illness commonly and predictably causes death
Carefully titrated opioids rarely hasten death.
E. This is equivalent to euthanasia
Intent and means distinguish this from euthanasia.
Practice the rest
Build a quiz from this topic, or sit a full length exam under real conditions.
Start free
